Keyword summary
⁠3%5 analyzed articles/videos3,432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elk Fire results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,410 hits. Analysis detected 5,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,081 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (36,975 of 37,536 keywords). This Elk Fire is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Elk Fire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠2%Elk Fire (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,081
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.5% percentile
1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos