Keyword summary
5% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electricity Prices results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,023 hits . Analysis detected 8,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,137 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (35,976 of 37,326 keywords). This Electricity Prices is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Electricity Prices
Keyword details
Total words: 16,137
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst