Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Election Meddling results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Meddling is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Election Meddling
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Election Meddling (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,065
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos