Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Hacking results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 2,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 909 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,899 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Hacking is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Election Hacking
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%Election Hacking (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 909
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510092.3% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles909 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 39.0%39.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 21.9%21.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos