Keyword summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Controversy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 684 hits. Analysis detected 4,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,513 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,527 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Election Controversy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Election Controversy (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,513
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos