Keyword summary
66%2 analyzed articles/videos386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Conspiracy Theories results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 944 hits. Analysis detected 6,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,678 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,115 of 35,701 keywords). This Election Conspiracy Theories is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Election Conspiracy Theories
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
67%Election Conspiracy Theories (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,678
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos