Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,353 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Betting results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 753 hits . Analysis detected 5,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,801 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,305 of 34,429 keywords). This Election Betting is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Election Betting
Keyword details
Total words: 8,801
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst