Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor Roosevelt results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 549 hits. Analysis detected 3,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,405 of 37,536 keywords). This Eleanor Roosevelt is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
43%Eleanor Roosevelt (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos