Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eisenhower results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 607 hits . Analysis detected 4,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,565 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,336 of 35,014 keywords). This Eisenhower is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Eisenhower
Keyword details
Total words: 2,565
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.5% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.7% 23.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 22.6% 22.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst