Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eileen Wang results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 735 hits . Analysis detected 4,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,435 of 37,536 keywords). This Eileen Wang is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. Eileen Wang
Keyword details
Total words: 4,784
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst