Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Egalitarianism results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , In-Group Bias , and Halo Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 1,943 hits . Analysis detected 8,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,821 of 35,718 keywords). This Egalitarianism is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Egalitarianism
Keyword details
Total words: 6,164
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 31.5% 31.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Keyword 31.5%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst