Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Egalitarianism results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 1,943 hits. Analysis detected 8,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,821 of 35,718 keywords). This Egalitarianism is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Egalitarianism
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
76%Egalitarianism (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,164
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 31.5%31.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Keyword 31.5%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%AnecdotalSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos