Keyword summary
43% 2 analyzed articles/videos 253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Education Reform results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 645 hits . Analysis detected 5,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,498 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,815 of 37,536 keywords). This Education Reform is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Education Reform
Keyword details
Total words: 6,498
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst