Keyword summary
11%2 analyzed articles/videos855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edmonton Oilers results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 1,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,682 of 35,675 keywords). This Edmonton Oilers is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Edmonton Oilers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
23%Edmonton Oilers (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos