OutKick88%

Wayne Gretzky's 1988 Stanley Cup Final jersey sells for $2.8M, setting an all-time hockey record 11%

By Amber Harding0%

4/26/2026, 11:34:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Red Herring, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 358 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of 11% (18,906 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the article peer group.

The most expensive hockey jersey ever sold now belongs to Wayne Gretzky. 
And that’s probably how it should be. 
The jersey Gretzky wore during Game 4 of the 1988 Stanley Cup Final just sold for a staggering $2,806,000, setting a new all-time record for a hockey jersey. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE FROM OUTKICK 
That same jersey  worn during his final championship run with the Edmonton Oilers  had previously held the record, selling for $1.452 million back in 2022. 
Not anymore. 
This isn’t just any game-worn sweater, either. 
It was worn during Gretzky’s final Stanley Cup run in 1988. 
Photo-matching later confirmed he wore it in multiple games, including Games 1 and 4 of the Final. 
It’s tied to one of the strangest moments in NHL history. 
Game 4 against the Boston Bruins was famously canceled mid-game due to a power outage at Boston Garden with the score tied 3-3. 
Two days later, the teams replayed the game, and the Oilers closed it out with a 6-3 win to complete the sweep and secure Gretzky’s fourth and final Stanley Cup. 
JOHN ELWAY, A YANKEES DRAFT PICK, GETS OWN BASEBALL CARD WITH HELP FROM 'SEINFELD' CO-CREATOR LARRY DAVID 
He finished that postseason with 43 points in 19 games and took home the Conn Smythe Trophy as playoff MVP. 
But wait, there’s more. 
This jersey is also connected to another milestone. 
Gretzky wore it in a March 1, 1988, game where he recorded his 1,050th career assist, passing Gordie Howe for the NHL record at the time. 
By the time he retired in 1999, Gretzky had piled up 1,963 assists  still 700+ more than any player in NHL history. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Shortly after that 1988 Cup run, Gretzky was traded to the Los Angeles Kings. 
He went on to play 20 seasons in the NHL before retiring in 1999, when he was immediately inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame with the waiting period waived. 
And now, nearly three decades later, he’s still setting records. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Amber Harding: 4.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 5.5%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Amber Harding: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 6.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 4.7%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring4.7%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 3.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 18.7%Amber Harding: 12.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice18.7%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Amber Harding: 3.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.5%

358 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers4.5%attributed speech342writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageOUTKICK • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageFOX NEWS • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

FOX NEWS

100%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words50% of attributed speech25% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%FOX NEWS: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.6 ptsWriter: 19.6%FOX NEWS: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.