Keyword summary
86%3 analyzed articles/videos563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Editorials results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 1,518 hits. Analysis detected 11,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,812 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,060 of 34,832 keywords). This Editorials is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Editorials
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
66%Editorials (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,812
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.3%22.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.6%12.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos