Keyword summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edinburgh results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 544 hits . Analysis detected 4,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,859 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,551 of 37,536 keywords). This Edinburgh is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Edinburgh
Keyword details
Total words: 2,859
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.6% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 19.0% 19.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst