Keyword summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ediacaran Period results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 2,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,700 of 37,536 keywords). This Ediacaran Period is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Ediacaran Period
Keyword details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst