Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edi Rama results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 480 hits. Analysis detected 2,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,406 of 35,444 keywords). This Edi Rama is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Edi Rama
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
51%Edi Rama (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos