Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edi Rama results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 480 hits . Analysis detected 2,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,406 of 35,444 keywords). This Edi Rama is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Edi Rama
Keyword details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst