Keyword summary
53% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Miliband results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 1,724 hits . Analysis detected 9,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,998 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,392 of 35,444 keywords). This Ed Miliband is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Ed Miliband
Keyword details
Total words: 7,998
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst