Keyword summary
⁠20%3 analyzed articles/videos621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ebt results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 8,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,084 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (30,489 of 37,536 keywords). This Ebt is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Ebt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠19%Ebt (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,084
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos