Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Eating Habits results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 765 hits. Analysis detected 4,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,700 keywords). This Eating Habits is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Eating Habits
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Eating Habits (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos