Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Eating Habits results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 765 hits . Analysis detected 4,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,700 keywords). This Eating Habits is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Eating Habits
Keyword details
Total words: 5,900
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst