Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eat-Here results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 1,850 hits. Analysis detected 8,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,504 of 36,673 keywords). This Eat-Here is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Eat-Here
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
61%Eat-Here (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate