Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Earnestness results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 599 hits . Analysis detected 3,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of â 69% (11,734 of 37,536 keywords). This Earnestness is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Earnestness
Keyword details
Total words: 2,808
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst