Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E Street Band results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 2,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (5,243 of 37,536 keywords). This E Street Band is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
E Street Band
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠86%E Street Band (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,812
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 21.5%21.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.2%13.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos