Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E Pluribus Unum results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 4,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,961 of 37,536 keywords). This E Pluribus Unum is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
E Pluribus Unum
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
34%E Pluribus Unum (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos