Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dumplings results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 2,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (34,113 of 37,536 keywords). This Dumplings is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Dumplings
Keyword details
Total words: 5,200
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.0% Straw Man: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst