Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drake results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 1,747 hits. Analysis detected 9,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,135 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,912 of 37,489 keywords). This Drake is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Drake
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Drake (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,135
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.5%21.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.0%18.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate