Keyword summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos1,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Draft Lottery results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,561 hits. Analysis detected 7,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,078 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,768 of 37,536 keywords). This Draft Lottery is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Draft Lottery
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
48%Draft Lottery (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,078
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos