Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr Oz results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 2,365 hits . Analysis detected 16,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,345 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,507 of 37,536 keywords). This Dr Oz is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Dr Oz
Keyword details
Total words: 10,345
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst