Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dodd Frank Act results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 289 hits. Analysis detected 3,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Dodd Frank Act is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dodd Frank Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Dodd Frank Act (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos