Keyword summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Docuseries results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 1,556 hits . Analysis detected 9,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,776 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,069 of 37,536 keywords). This Docuseries is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Docuseries
Keyword details
Total words: 4,776
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 32.6% 32.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 18.7% 18.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst