Keyword summary
88% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diversity Initiatives results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,114 hits . Analysis detected 9,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,161 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,591 of 37,536 keywords). This Diversity Initiatives is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Diversity Initiatives
Keyword details
Total words: 7,161
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst