Keyword summary
69%1 analyzed article/video521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dirty Soda results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 634 hits. Analysis detected 3,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,112 of 37,536 keywords). This Dirty Soda is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Dirty Soda
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Dirty Soda (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 30.4%30.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 23.6%23.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos