Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dinocephalosaurus results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 2,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,303 of 37,536 keywords). This Dinocephalosaurus is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group. Dinocephalosaurus
Keyword details
Total words: 1,482
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.2% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 29.6% 29.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 29.6%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst