Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dining Guide results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 3,646 hits . Analysis detected 11,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,793 of 37,536 keywords). This Dining Guide is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Dining Guide
Keyword details
Total words: 7,960
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 45.8% 45.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 45.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst