Keyword summary
19%3 analyzed articles/videos5,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Sovereignty results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,574 hits. Analysis detected 12,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,938 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (33,060 of 34,426 keywords). This Digital Sovereignty is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Digital Sovereignty
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
4%Digital Sovereignty (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,938
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.0% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos