Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dieter F Uchtdorf results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 2,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,330 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,884 of 37,536 keywords). This Dieter F Uchtdorf is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Dieter F Uchtdorf
Keyword details
Total words: 3,330
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst