Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Die Hard results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Anchoring Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 795 faulty-reasoning hits from 339 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,020 of 37,536 keywords). This Die Hard is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group.
Die Hard
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
95%Die Hard (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 339
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.6% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles339 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 26.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos