Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diabetes Management results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 512 hits . Analysis detected 3,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,547 of 37,533 keywords). This Diabetes Management is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Diabetes Management
Keyword details
Total words: 3,672
Article count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst