Keyword summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dhaka results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 2,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,165 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (20,958 of 36,094 keywords). This Dhaka is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Dhaka
Keyword details
Total words: 3,165
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst