Keyword summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit Chinatown results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 166 hits . Analysis detected 1,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,536 of 37,536 keywords). This Detroit Chinatown is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Detroit Chinatown
Keyword details
Total words: 1,920
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst