Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deremer Shawn results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 1,081 hits. Analysis detected 3,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,462 of 37,536 keywords). This Deremer Shawn is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Deremer Shawn
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Deremer Shawn (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 37.6%37.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 37.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos