Keyword summary
42% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department Of Labor results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,148 hits . Analysis detected 11,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,778 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,250 of 37,536 keywords). This Department Of Labor is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Department Of Labor
Keyword details
Total words: 12,778
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst