Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Department Of Fish And Wildlife results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 2,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Department Of Fish And Wildlife is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Department Of Fish And Wildlife
Keyword details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst