Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Democrats Israel Aid Trump Netanyahu results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 863 hits . Analysis detected 3,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,749 keywords). This Democrats Israel Aid Trump Netanyahu is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Democrats Israel Aid Trump Netanyahu
Keyword details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 30.2% 30.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst