Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Supporters results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 1,065 hits . Analysis detected 8,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,852 of 37,536 keywords). This Democratic Supporters is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. Democratic Supporters
Keyword details
Total words: 3,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.7% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.8% 27.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 23.5% 23.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst