Keyword summary
14%1 analyzed article/video1,938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Senate Primary results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 2,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (47,451 of 50,197 keywords). This Democratic Senate Primary is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Democratic Senate Primary
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
6%Democratic Senate Primary (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

6% percentile
02550751005.5% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos