Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Primaries results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 477 hits . Analysis detected 3,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,313 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,491 of 37,536 keywords). This Democratic Primaries is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Democratic Primaries
Keyword details
Total words: 3,313
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst