Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Governors results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 438 hits. Analysis detected 3,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,017 of 36,918 keywords). This Democratic Governors is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Democratic Governors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
41%Democratic Governors (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos