Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Democratic Gala results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Horn Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 476 hits. Analysis detected 2,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Democratic Gala is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Democratic Gala
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Democratic Gala (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 27.1%27.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 38.4%38.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 38.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 1.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos